Re: [HACKERS] Re: Apparent bug in _make_subplan

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Apparent bug in _make_subplan
Date: 1999-06-18 04:43:07
Message-ID: 199906180443.AAA16066@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> subselect.c uses varlevelsup as absolute level number only
> for correlation vars <--> params mapping, so why should it be
> source of bugs? SS_replace_correlation_vars replaces all
> correlation vars with parameters. Vars with absolute varlevelsup
> are in PlannerParamVar only. To identify correlation vars and
> to know is parameter already assigned to a var we obviously
> need in absolute level number.

But the varlevelsup I pass in from the parser are relative to the
current level, not absolute.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 1999-06-18 05:27:01 RE: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig
Previous Message Vadim Mikheev 1999-06-18 04:10:57 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Apparent bug in _make_subplan