Re: [HACKERS] (don't know who else to tell) 6.5 gets build on LinuxPPCR5 but fails a lot of regr. tests

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp
Cc: gravity <z(dot)nijmeyers(at)cable(dot)a2000(dot)nl>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] (don't know who else to tell) 6.5 gets build on LinuxPPCR5 but fails a lot of regr. tests
Date: 1999-06-18 01:21:21
Message-ID: 199906180121.VAA10925@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > OK, should I change the template for linux_ppc to -O0?
>
> Not all linux_ppc box is suffered by the problem actually, so it might
> be over kill. However, it should definitely stop complains from
> LinuxPPC R5 users, and I have to admit it seems the best solution for
> a short term.
>
> But for the long term, we have to repair our codes. See the posting
> from you below.
>
> P.S. I don't see your addition to the TODO in the 6.5 source tree.

Added:

* Fix C optimizer problem where fmgr_ptr calls return different types

I think I removed it because we didn't think it was a problem at one
point. Now we know it is. Good target for 6.6.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-06-18 01:39:18 Re: [HACKERS] 'idle' processes in v6.5?
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 1999-06-18 01:02:47 Re: [HACKERS] (don't know who else to tell) 6.5 gets build on LinuxPPCR5 but fails a lot of regr. tests