Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development"(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig
Date: 1999-06-17 15:06:28
Message-ID: 199906171506.LAA25209@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >>>> Config.h has this. Does this need to be updated because we can't vacuum
> >>>> multi-segment relations? I have changed it to 7F000000:
> >>
> >> Why? I thought we'd fixed the mdtruncate issue.
>
> > I am told we did not by Hiroshi. It was news to me too.
>
> Then we'd better fix the underlying problem. We can't change
> RELSEG_SIZE for a minor release, unless you want to give up the
> principle of not forcing initdb at minor releases.

Why can't we increase it?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-06-17 15:10:34 Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-06-17 15:05:18 Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig