Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] Patch for m68k architecture

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Henry B(dot) Hotz" <hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov>
Cc: "Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] Patch for m68k architecture
Date: 1999-06-12 08:47:18
Message-ID: 199906120847.RAA04701@srapc451.sra.co.jp
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports

>At 8:29 AM -0700 6/10/99, Oliver Elphick wrote:
>>This patch should enable 6.5 to build on Motorola 68000 architecture. It
>>comes
>>from Roman Hodek <Roman(dot)Hodek(at)informatik(dot)uni-erlangen(dot)de>.
>
>Has anyone compared the Linux/m68k patch with the NetBSD/m68k patch (which
>I believe was already included in 6.5)?

yes.

>Also I have been trying to cross-post some traffic on the
>port-mac68k(at)NetBSD(dot)org list to the PG-ports list and it hasn't been
>appearing afaict. Am I just not looking carefully enough or is something
>screwy?

I have tried 6.4beta4 on NetBSD 1.3.3/m68k. It failed while running
initdb:

Creating template database in /usr/local/pgsql/data/base/template1

FATAL: s_lock(001bbea3) at bufmgr.c:1992, stuck spinlock. Aborting.

FATAL: s_lock(001bbea3) at bufmgr.c:1992, stuck spinlock. Aborting.

Seems something really bad is going on...
--
Tatsuo Ishii

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 1999-06-12 10:27:11 Re: [HACKERS] "DML"
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-06-12 04:18:16 Re: patch for large queries

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 1999-06-12 15:39:19 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] Patch for m68k architecture
Previous Message Unprivileged user 1999-06-11 21:31:10 Port Bug Report: Errors in Subselect (two related bugs)