| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5 <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "'kar(at)webline(dot)dk'" <kar(at)webline(dot)dk> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 items |
| Date: | 1999-06-08 15:41:11 |
| Message-ID: | 199906081541.LAA17092@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> > - Up time. This means hot backup and no locking of the database during
> > vacuum.
> >
> If Vadim made the change to make pg_dump dump in one transaction then
> PostgreSQL already has "hot backup" in 6.5. This will do a consistent
> snapshot of your database as it was when pg_dump began as long as you
> don't change the database layout during the dump.
Excellent point.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-06-08 16:25:33 | Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 items |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-06-08 15:40:18 | Re: [HACKERS] Problem when reloading data from older version |