Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6 (Large Objects)

From: "Cary O'Brien" <cobrien(at)Radix(dot)Net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6 (Large Objects)
Date: 1999-06-04 13:38:23
Message-ID: 199906041338.JAA09639@saltmine.radix.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Ok, BLOBS may go. But if they stay, can they not be stored
all in the same directory? With a fixed rule for making
subdirectories (i.e. xinv/00 xinv/01 .. where number is last
8 bits of oid, or some sort of hash) then users can spread
the size of the data out over lots of partitions using
softlinks.

-- cary
cobrien(at)radix(dot)net

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message bse 1999-06-04 13:41:36 inet data type and select
Previous Message Chris Griesel 1999-06-04 12:17:42 inet data types & select