Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6
Date: 1999-06-03 19:52:15
Message-ID: 199906031952.PAA27017@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Jan Wieck writes (over in pgsql-sql):
> > * WE STILL NEED THE GENERAL TUPLE SPLIT CAPABILITY!!! *
>
> I've been thinking about making this post for a while ... with 6.5
> almost out the door, I guess now is a good time.
>
> I don't know what people have had in mind for 6.6, but I propose that
> there ought to be three primary objectives for our next release:
>
> 1. Eliminate arbitrary restrictions on tuple size.
>
> 2. Eliminate arbitrary restrictions on query size (textual
> length/complexity that is).
>
> 3. Cure within-statement memory leaks, so that processing large numbers
> of tuples in one statement is reliable.

I think the other hot item for 6.6 is outer joins.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vadim Mikheev 1999-06-03 19:59:14 Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-06-03 19:11:57 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Freezing docs for v6.5