Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Column name's length

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Zalman Stern <zalman(at)netcom(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Column name's length
Date: 1999-06-02 04:33:09
Message-ID: 199906020433.AAA12864@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> This is obviously not a 100% solution, since there's a risk of name
> collisions (averylongfieldname1 and averylongfieldname2) but it's
> probably a 95% solution, and it wouldn't take much work or risk.
>
> Comments? Objections? I think I could argue that this is a bug fix
> and deserves to be slipped into 6.5 ;-)

Trying to slip it in as a bug fix. Sounds like me, Tom. :-)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-06-02 05:32:56 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Column name's length
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-06-02 04:25:56 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Column name's length