| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items |
| Date: | 1999-06-01 07:44:30 |
| Message-ID: | 199906010744.QAA12286@srapc451.sra.co.jp |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> Just a few questions.
>>
>> o I observed the backend processes grew ~10MB with -B 1024. Is this
>> normal?
>
>Backend attaches to 1024*8K + other shmem, so probably
>ps takes it into account.
Oh, I see.
>> o Is it possible to let the backend wait for free buffers in case of
>> insufficient shared buffers? (with reasonable retries, of course)
>
>Yes, but not now.
Agreed.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5 | 1999-06-01 08:03:10 | Re: [HACKERS] please? (non blocking lock) |
| Previous Message | Vadim Mikheev | 1999-06-01 07:40:45 | Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items |