| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Theo Kramer <theo(at)flame(dot)co(dot)za> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] please? |
| Date: | 1999-05-31 19:10:55 |
| Message-ID: | 199905311910.PAA28600@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I don't know of any SQL databases that allow non-blocking lock requests.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Oracle OCI has oopt() and Informix Online has dirty read that do the trick for
> > > me.
> > > --------
> >
> > Please give me more information. How does dirty read fix the problem?
>
> It allows me to read uncommited records without blocking.
Yes, but that does not solve his problem. He wants a single lock, and
wants to test the lock, and immediately return if the lock fails.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Trever Adams | 1999-05-31 19:23:03 | Re: [HACKERS] Backend sent 0x45 type while idle |
| Previous Message | Pablo Funes | 1999-05-31 19:05:53 | Re: [HACKERS] please? |