From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Jan Wieck <jwieck(at)debis(dot)com>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list |
Date: | 1999-05-11 18:37:41 |
Message-ID: | 199905111837.OAA20995@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Ugh. I thought that was a pretty unrobust way of doing things :-(
> If you change the lines in planner.c:
>
> /* Is it safe to use just resno to match tlist and glist items?? */
> if (grpcl->entry->resdom->resno == resdom->resno)
>
> to use equal() on the expr's of the two TLEs, does it work any better?
>
> > Currently I think the correct solution would be to expand the
> > targetlist already in the rewrite system and leave it
> > untouched in the planner. Comments?
>
> OK with me, but possibly rather a major change to be making this late
> in beta...
But it is already broken. Can't get worse, can it?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Massimo Dal Zotto | 1999-05-11 18:41:28 | Re: [HACKERS] problems with parser |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-05-11 18:30:20 | Re: [HACKERS] More on GROUP BY |