From: | Ulf Mehlig <umehlig(at)uni-bremen(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us |
Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] cluster truncates table name? |
Date: | 1999-05-10 16:38:57 |
Message-ID: | 199905101638.SAA10967@pandora3.localnet |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Sorry, I can't reproduce this here on 6.5beta.
Why sorry? I'm happy if it doesn't appear in 6.5 ;-) But then, could
there be a misconfiguration or something like that in my 6.4(.0)
database, or could it be that the problem silently disappeared on the
way between 6.4 and 6.5? (I'm not moving to 6.5 beta because I have to
finish my theses, and nearly all the data is under postgreSQL ...)
Thank you anyway for your answer (and for postgreSQL ;-)
regards,
Ulf
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Could there be a bug in the 'cluster' command in postgreSQL 6.4? If I
> try to cluster a table with a name with more than 8 characters, psql
> says:
>
> xxx=> create table x123456789 (xxx text);
> CREATE
> xxx=> create index x123 on x123456789 (xxx);
> CREATE
> xxx=> cluster x123 on x123456789;
> ERROR: Relation x1234567 Does Not Exist!
--
======================================================================
Ulf Mehlig <umehlig(at)zmt(dot)uni-bremen(dot)de>
Center for Tropical Marine Ecology/ZMT, Bremen, Germany
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-05-10 16:46:27 | Re: [GENERAL] cluster truncates table name? |
Previous Message | Vince Vielhaber | 1999-05-10 16:25:00 | Re: [DOCS] Re: [GENERAL] dbase converter |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 1999-05-10 16:39:08 | Re: [HACKERS] create view as select distinct (fwd) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-05-10 16:38:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug: alias is a "non-group column"? |