Re: [HACKERS] min() and max() causing aborts

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: michael(dot)davis(at)prevuenet(dot)com (Michael Davis)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] min() and max() causing aborts
Date: 1999-03-21 06:29:09
Message-ID: 199903210629.BAA17765@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> I just did another cvs update and nothing was updated. So, I have already
> applied this patch, the path has not been committed in to cvs, or the patch
> did not do it for me :-).

All I can say is that I was getting the exact pattern of failures you
got until I backed out the patch.

Are other people now seeing aggregate failure. If so, I will post the
remainder of the patch that is still installed to see if removing that
will help, thought the other part deals more with expressions than
aggregates.

I just tested and it shows as applied. I am confused.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-03-21 07:04:18 Re: [HACKERS] Binary-compatible types vs. overloaded operators
Previous Message Michael Davis 1999-03-21 05:12:07 RE: [HACKERS] min() and max() causing aborts