| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | pierre(at)desertmoon(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [SQL] 6.4.x vs. 6.5 oddity |
| Date: | 1999-03-08 19:33:50 |
| Message-ID: | 199903081933.OAA07992@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
> All,
> I have started playing with 6.5 and duped my DB onto a
> spare box. I grabbed one of the most intensive queries that
> runs under the current system and ran it on 6.5. It took
> FOREVER. I then ran explain on both 6.4 and 6.5 and here is
> the output for both...can anyone explain what the issue is here?
> Or is it just that 6.5 is still in development?
>
> (All tables are vacuumed)
>
Also, during the recent weeks, GEQO was being enabled for >= 6 tables.
Try SET GEQO TO 'off'. The current CVS has the GEQO setting at 11.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 1999-03-08 19:53:02 | Re: [SQL] 6.4.x vs. 6.5 oddity |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-03-08 19:29:29 | Re: [SQL] 6.4.x vs. 6.5 oddity |