Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again
Date: 1999-03-08 07:42:56
Message-ID: 19990308084256.A227@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 02:22:28PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Wait a sec ... ecpg? ecpg shouldn't be depending on backend internals
> at all, should it? I thought we were talking about support for
> dynamically loaded backend extensions.

Hmm, historically ecpg's ecpglib.h includes postgres.h which include
palloc.h. But scanning through postgres.h I wonder why.

I will check that as soon as I find time.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz | Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: Michael(dot)Meskes(at)gmx(dot)net | Use PostgreSQL!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Reifenberger 1999-03-08 07:57:56
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-03-08 07:18:34 Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.3 release