| From: | Michael Meskes <Michael_Meskes(at)topmail(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Keywords |
| Date: | 1999-02-09 09:48:07 |
| Message-ID: | 19990209104807.C241@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 01:15:09PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> We don't reserve the type names as keywords, and because they can create
> their own types, it wouldn't make sense.
I don't exactly understand that. For instance the 'int' keyword will still
be reserved, isn't it?
> Seems like more work than it's worth, no? Why not have psql queries
> that can't be done in ecpg. Most commercial embedded sql's have a more
> limited keyword set, don't they?
I have no idea. Anyone else?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz | Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: Michael(dot)Meskes(at)gmx(dot)net | Use PostgreSQL!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 1999-02-09 09:49:02 | Re: [HACKERS] TIME QUALIFICATION |
| Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 | 1999-02-09 09:46:39 | AW: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 |