Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, vadim(at)krs(dot)ru, eberger(at)gewi(dot)kfunigraz(dot)ac(dot)at, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules
Date: 1999-02-08 15:20:08
Message-ID: 199902081520.KAA14388@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > This is normally caused by Stephan's patches. His patches were
> > originally against 6.3, and he ported them to 6.4, but he normally does
> > lots of development without any communication with us, sends us a huge
> > patch, and we normally have to clean up the edges somewhat. This patch
> > actually caused fewer problems than the HAVING patch he submitted.

>
> Porting his patch to v6.4 was not exactly what he did. He
> changed the v6.5 tree in a way that his patch fit's into.

Yes, I understand the frustration. I had that with HAVING. I
symathize. It also bothers me when things are added that are disruptive
to other code, and I see he did that.

Should we remove his patch? I don't know.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1999-02-08 15:44:44 Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-02-08 15:16:40 Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0