| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane) |
| Cc: | marc(at)fallon(dot)classyad(dot)com, pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes |
| Date: | 1999-02-08 03:48:31 |
| Message-ID: | 199902080348.WAA04656@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
>
> Note to hackers: is there a good reason why indexes are more
> restrictive? Offhand it seems like the same physical-equivalence
> trick could be applied.
What do you mean by restrictive. If you mean:
* allow creation of functional indexes to use default types
It is on the TODO list, and has been for a while.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-02-08 04:29:02 | Added \p\g to psql |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-02-08 03:18:35 | Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Claudius du Plessis | 1999-02-08 09:08:07 | |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-02-08 03:18:35 | Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes |