Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org (The Hermit Hacker)
Cc: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ?
Date: 1999-02-07 23:40:57
Message-ID: 199902072340.SAA19126@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I will update the stuff in the REL6_4 tree for 6.4.3.

> On Sun, 7 Feb 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > 3. Test the second bugfix release with the result of step 2
> > > and upgrade production. If the first bugfix release can
> > > stand for a time long enough without further bugs
> > > reported, use that for this step.
> > >
> > > 4. Follow subsequent bugfix releases if the fixes in them do
> > > or could be expected to happen in the production.
> > >
> > > Doing it this way means, that a mission critical installation
> > > will use v6.4.* until some time after we've put out at least
> > > v6.5.1. Thus, we should care about them.
> >
> > Now I see why you patching against 6.4.
>
> The arguments for a v6.4.3 make sense to me...tell me when you wish for
> this to be created, and it shall be done :)
>
> Marc G. Fournier
> Systems Administrator @ hub.org
> primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
>
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter T Mount 1999-02-07 23:43:53 RE: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0
Previous Message Jan Wieck 1999-02-07 23:10:27 Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules