Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ?
Date: 1999-02-07 20:33:43
Message-ID: 199902072033.PAA15804@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> 3. Test the second bugfix release with the result of step 2
> and upgrade production. If the first bugfix release can
> stand for a time long enough without further bugs
> reported, use that for this step.
>
> 4. Follow subsequent bugfix releases if the fixes in them do
> or could be expected to happen in the production.
>
> Doing it this way means, that a mission critical installation
> will use v6.4.* until some time after we've put out at least
> v6.5.1. Thus, we should care about them.

Now I see why you patching against 6.4.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

  • v6.4.3 ? at 1999-02-07 17:30:43 from Jan Wieck

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-02-07 20:35:34 Re: [HACKERS] Problems building some libraries in 6.4.2
Previous Message Jan Wieck 1999-02-07 20:30:23 Re: [HACKERS] equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal