| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ian Grant <I(dot)A(dot)N(dot)Grant(at)damtp(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Backend problem with large objects |
| Date: | 1999-02-05 01:05:25 |
| Message-ID: | 199902050105.KAA25426@srapc451.sra.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>On Thu, 4 Feb 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>> Applied manually. The patch did not apply cleanly, and needed a &tuple
>> in inv_wrold, not tuple.
>
>In the 4.6.2 release there are no &tuple arguments to inv_wrold around the
>patch. Perhaps there is a patch you have applied that I need? Please see
>below:
My patches are for 6.4.2. Bruce is talking about current. Oh, I don't
know what version of PostgreSQL you are using.
>> > > On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>> > >
>> > Ok. I think I have found the source of the problem. Please apply
>> > included patches and try again.
>
>Many thanks indeed for this. Unfortunately it doesn't completely work: it
>fixes the problem as reported, but when, instead of writing five
>characters, one at a time, I write five at once, the backend dies in
>the same place it did before. Here's the C code slightly modified to
>reproduce the problem:
Give me some time. I'm not sure if I could solve new problem, though.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1999-02-05 03:24:22 | Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-02-04 23:28:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer speed and GEQO (was: nested loops in joins) |