| From: | Viorel Anghel <vang(at)altavista(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org |
| Cc: | tim(at)dmcity(dot)net |
| Subject: | Re: [SQL] Performance Question |
| Date: | 1999-02-04 21:57:18 |
| Message-ID: | 19990204165718.E16437@zeus.advatech.ro |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 08:25:25PM -0600, Tim Perdue wrote:
> Please email directly to tim(at)dmcity(dot)net(dot)
hmm, and CC to list, we also want to know ;-)
[snip]
> am I going to get killed with a performance hit?? It's running OK now, with
> the table at 20MB, but I have 100MB more worth of letters to drop into the
> table..... 8-)
1. What does mean "OK now"? Just for my curiosity, on which machine and
which is the average time for such a query?
2. Why don't you test with the rest of 100MB and tell us what is happening?
--
___
<o-o> Viorel ANGHEL <vang(at)altavista(dot)net>
[`-']
-"-"-
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri | 1999-02-04 22:10:05 | Re: [SQL] problem with join & count |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-02-04 21:51:58 | Re: [SQL] keeping OID's when copying table |