From: | Tim Perdue <tim_perdue(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | vang(at)altavista(dot)net, pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] Performance Question |
Date: | 1999-02-04 15:24:38 |
Message-ID: | 19990204152438.25935.rocketmail@send106.yahoomail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Queries take a couple seconds on a PowerPC 604 @ 225Mhz, running
LinuxPPC R4 with 112MB RAM.
I have indexed the fld_mail_body but it doesn't seem to get used??
--Tim
---Viorel Anghel <vang(at)altavista(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 08:25:25PM -0600, Tim Perdue wrote:
> > Please email directly to tim(at)dmcity(dot)net(dot)
> hmm, and CC to list, we also want to know ;-)
>
> [snip]
>
> > am I going to get killed with a performance hit?? It's running OK
now, with
> > the table at 20MB, but I have 100MB more worth of letters to drop
into the
> > table..... 8-)
>
> 1. What does mean "OK now"? Just for my curiosity, on which machine
and
> which is the average time for such a query?
>
> 2. Why don't you test with the rest of 100MB and tell us what is
happening?
>
> --
> ___
> <o-o> Viorel ANGHEL <vang(at)altavista(dot)net>
> [`-']
> -"-"-
>
>
==
______________________________________________________
Tim Perdue
tim(at)perdue(dot)net
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 1999-02-04 15:27:54 | Re: Performance Question |
Previous Message | joop | 1999-02-04 08:33:02 |