Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane)
Cc: dms(at)wplus(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems
Date: 1999-02-03 20:10:21
Message-ID: 199902032010.PAA12503@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> 4. (old bug) Inastalation fail if prefix directory
> >> (e.g /usr/local/pgsql) doesn't exists
>
> > I am fixing this now.
>
> Are you sure it's a good idea to do anything other than fail?
>
> In a typical setup, the parent directory of the install target
> (ie, /usr/local) is going to be owned by root. If you are able
> to create the install target it means the installation is being
> done as root. We do *not* want to encourage people to install
> as root, methinks.
>
> I think the correct response is to leave the software alone and
> fix the documentation to remind people to create the top-level
> directory (as root) before running "make install" (as postgres).
> /usr/local/pgsql should be owned by postgres, so the install can
> proceed from that point without root privileges.

OK, I started to agree with you after I tried adding it. I will leave
it alone.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-02-03 21:27:27 Re: [GENERAL] Cost: Big Tables vs. Organized Separation of Data
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-02-03 20:06:10 Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems