Re: [GENERAL] Cost: Big Tables vs. Organized Separation of Data

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: bobd(at)palaver(dot)net (Bob Dusek)
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Cost: Big Tables vs. Organized Separation of Data
Date: 1999-02-03 03:57:01
Message-ID: 199902030357.WAA19925@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> 1. If I re-organize the data, I would be able to perform my queries
> without executing joins on multiple tables per query.
>
> 2. As I re-organize the data, the database becomes less and less
> intuitive and (seemingly) less "normal".
>
> So, I guess my question is: how costly are joins? I've heard that
> Postgres pretty much "pukes" (in terms of speed) when you're trying
> to do anything more than 6 table joins in one query. This leads
> me to believe that joins are fairly costly... ????
>
> Does anyone have any words of advice for me as I battle this?

We are working speeding up large table joins right now. Try doing SET
GEQO to set the value lower and see if that helps.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Herouth Maoz 1999-02-03 12:17:27 Re: [GENERAL] Unexpected input in plpgsql script.
Previous Message Bob Dusek 1999-02-03 01:41:23 Cost: Big Tables vs. Organized Separation of Data