Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com
Cc: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof
Date: 1999-02-02 16:39:18
Message-ID: 199902021639.LAA26704@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Since the bigger blocks are built on top of the existing
> > memory context model, it would not conflict with any enhanced
> > usage we could make with it.
> >
> > I include a patch at the end - please comment.
> >
> >
> > Jan
>
> Did anyone play around with it? I've had it installed now for
> some days and it work's well so far.
>
> How close are we to v6.5 BETA? Should I apply it to CURRENT?

Good question. I am done with temp tables, so Vadim makes the call on
when to start beta.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 1999-02-02 16:49:53 Re: [HACKERS] Small patches in copy.c and trigger.c
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-02-02 16:35:45 Re: [HACKERS] Small patches in copy.c and trigger.c