Re: [HACKERS] Patches

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'ArcyJ(dot)M(dot)Cain)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patches
Date: 1999-01-31 05:38:22
Message-ID: 199901310538.AAA10037@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I sent in a patch for createuser almost a week ago and I was wondering
> what the procedure is. I haven't seen the patch applied but I also
> haven't seen it rejected. I understand that not every one of my little
> gems is going to make it in but I hope there is some sort of closure
> method built into the process. In this case I think I have a useful
> little addition to createuser but if I am alone, it isn't important
> enough to diverge from the standard distribution. I just need to
> know one way or the other.
>
> In fact, this is the second time I sent in a similar patch for createuser
> and I never heard anything about the first time either and that was before
> 6.4 was released.

I have it. When I am doing my own development, I don't apply patches
from the list. They stay in my mailbox, and get applied before beta
starts. If someone else applies it, I remove my copy.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

  • Patches at 1999-01-31 03:42:04 from D'Arcy J.M. Cain

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-01-31 06:52:56 Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules
Previous Message Charles Hornberger 1999-01-31 05:35:07 Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules