Re: [GENERAL] Oracle vs Postgresql

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jamest(at)math(dot)ksu(dot)edu (James Thompson)
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Oracle vs Postgresql
Date: 1999-01-20 22:19:37
Message-ID: 199901202219.RAA08669@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Postgresql seems to offer me everything I'd need for the departmental
> work, and I find myself wondering if the only reason for my keeping Oracle
> around is to make the old resume look better. So....
>
> Why keep Oracle? Why switch to postgresql?
>
> I'd really appreciate peoples thoughts on this.

I can't address the specific issues with Oracle because I have never
used it.

But, if you take a look at the web site www.postgresql.org, 6.5, due in
a month or two, will have MVCC locking, which is just like Oracle
locking, but better, I am told.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Thompson 1999-01-21 00:11:05 Max length of a field name
Previous Message James Thompson 1999-01-20 22:13:50 Oracle vs Postgresql