From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | jamest(at)math(dot)ksu(dot)edu (James Thompson) |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Oracle vs Postgresql |
Date: | 1999-01-20 22:19:37 |
Message-ID: | 199901202219.RAA08669@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> Postgresql seems to offer me everything I'd need for the departmental
> work, and I find myself wondering if the only reason for my keeping Oracle
> around is to make the old resume look better. So....
>
> Why keep Oracle? Why switch to postgresql?
>
> I'd really appreciate peoples thoughts on this.
I can't address the specific issues with Oracle because I have never
used it.
But, if you take a look at the web site www.postgresql.org, 6.5, due in
a month or two, will have MVCC locking, which is just like Oracle
locking, but better, I am told.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | James Thompson | 1999-01-21 00:11:05 | Max length of a field name |
Previous Message | James Thompson | 1999-01-20 22:13:50 | Oracle vs Postgresql |