Re: [HACKERS] Re: BSDI 3.1 -> BSDI 4.0 performance degradation;(h

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org (PostgreSQL-development)
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: BSDI 3.1 -> BSDI 4.0 performance degradation;(h
Date: 1999-01-20 00:49:43
Message-ID: 199901200049.JAA24641@srapc451.sra.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>> > I have seen gnu sed version 1.* beat bsd sed by 2-3x.
>>
>> Partly my fault, I fear. The regular-expression code used in BSD sed,
>> last I checked, was the version I supplied for 4.4BSD... which works but
>> was done in haste and is rather slow. A much improved new release (new
>> implementation, in fact) is imminent, and the BSDI folk are likely to take
>> advantage of it (they've prodded me about it from time to time).
>
>Cool. I think I have bugged you a few times too.
>
>I hate to see the GNU tools beat the BSD tools.
>
>PostgreSQL(www.postgresql.org) is ready to your replace your old regex
>code with your new code as soon as you are ready. FYI, we have a
>February 1 beta planned if you need testers.
>
>Hope you will announce something publically when it is ready.

Please do not remove the old regex code in current source tree
(ifdef'ed is ok) since I will not have enough time right now to make
I18N version of the new regex code.
--
Tatsuo Ishii

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vadim Mikheev 1999-01-20 02:04:39 Re: [HACKERS] performance test
Previous Message Brook Milligan 1999-01-19 23:09:14 pg_dump -c option to drop prior to create