Re: BSDI 3.1 -> BSDI 4.0 performance degradation;(h

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: henry(at)spsystems(dot)net (Henry Spencer)
Cc: bsdi-users(at)bsdi(dot)com, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org (PostgreSQL-development)
Subject: Re: BSDI 3.1 -> BSDI 4.0 performance degradation;(h
Date: 1999-01-19 23:08:54
Message-ID: 199901192308.SAA16899@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > I have seen gnu sed version 1.* beat bsd sed by 2-3x.
>
> Partly my fault, I fear. The regular-expression code used in BSD sed,
> last I checked, was the version I supplied for 4.4BSD... which works but
> was done in haste and is rather slow. A much improved new release (new
> implementation, in fact) is imminent, and the BSDI folk are likely to take
> advantage of it (they've prodded me about it from time to time).

Cool. I think I have bugged you a few times too.

I hate to see the GNU tools beat the BSD tools.

PostgreSQL(www.postgresql.org) is ready to your replace your old regex
code with your new code as soon as you are ready. FYI, we have a
February 1 beta planned if you need testers.

Hope you will announce something publically when it is ready.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brook Milligan 1999-01-19 23:09:14 pg_dump -c option to drop prior to create
Previous Message Chris Williams 1999-01-19 21:48:05 2 Questions, Solaris 7 & Upgrading to 6.4.2