Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane)
Cc: mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof
Date: 1999-01-18 16:48:22
Message-ID: 199901181648.LAA13125@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> What we need to do here is to re-introduce the buffering ability of
> stdio into backend libpq. If you compare the current frontend libpq,
> you'll notice that it reads or writes the socket a bufferload at a time,
> not a character at a time.

FYI, I never profiles massive inserts. I usually profiles just SELECT
statements on large tables.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1999-01-18 17:06:38 Re: [HACKERS] I need a PostgreSQL vacation
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-01-18 16:47:32 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof