| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josef Šimánek <josef(dot)simanek(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Thomas Kellerer <shammat(at)gmx(dot)net>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New "function tables" in V13 documentation |
| Date: | 2020-11-09 20:59:17 |
| Message-ID: | 1998401.1604955557@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
=?UTF-8?B?Sm9zZWYgxaBpbcOhbmVr?= <josef(dot)simanek(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> But it is not clear for me what exactly was the problem with the old
> format. Is there any discussion anyone can point me to to ensure I'll
> not just revive the old problems, but improve the overall situation?
The primary discussion threads for this change were
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/9326.1581457869%40sss.pgh.pa.us
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/8691.1586798003%40sss.pgh.pa.us
There are a lot of older threads about content (not layout) deficiencies
in our docs that were practically impossible to fix under the old format;
here's one:
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron | 2020-11-09 21:01:35 | Re: New "function tables" in V13 documentation |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2020-11-09 20:51:20 | Re: New "function tables" in V13 documentation |