Re: SSL BIO wrappers

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SSL BIO wrappers
Date: 2008-12-09 19:52:52
Message-ID: 19984.1228852372@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> The logic in it is identical to the original import of code in OpenSSL.
> It originally had #ifdefs around how the BIO interface worked. That was
> tidied up in a commit back in 2001. I think it's fair to say it's been
> pretty stable.

Fair enough.

> Do you have a comment around the "should we prepare for read even though
> it's a write" part?

We shouldn't; in fact that would be quite wrong.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-12-09 20:02:31 Re: parallel restore vs. windows
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2008-12-09 19:45:39 Re: parallel restore vs. windows