Re: [SQL] char type seems the same as char(1)

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu (Thomas G(dot) Lockhart)
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [SQL] char type seems the same as char(1)
Date: 1998-12-14 00:45:33
Message-ID: 199812140045.TAA04193@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

> > If we use char1 for internal tables, we should allow it externally, if
> > only as char1. I will add it to the TODO list.
>
> As what?

As "char1", of course.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-12-14 01:11:04 Re: [SQL] char type seems the same as char(1)
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-12-14 00:24:41 Re: [SQL] char type seems the same as char(1)