Re: [HACKERS] redolog - for discussion

> On Sat, 12 Dec 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > It's time to re-implement sequences! When they were implemented
> > > ~ 1.5 year ago there was no GRANT/REVOKE on VIEWs and so
> > > I had to create table for each sequence.
> > > There should be one system table - pg_sequence. One record
> > > for each sequence will be inserted into this table and
> > > one VIEW will be created:
> >
> > I thought you wanted a single table to prevent concurrent access/update
> > contension?
>
> let's revise what vadim stated *grin*
>
> "we should re-implement sequences for v6.5, since row-level
> locking will exist at that time"? *rofl*

Oh, now I understand. :-) Vadim, don't be so modest. :-)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026