Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com
Cc: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ?
Date: 1998-10-22 13:52:14
Message-ID: 199810221352.JAA19719@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

> > Jan, we found that I am having to require an initdb for the INET/CIDR
> > type, so if you want stuff to change the views/rules for the limit
> > addition post 6.4, please send them in and I will apply them.
> >
> > You clearly have the syntax down, so I think you should go ahead.
>
> This is the part that will enable post 6.4 add of the
> LIMIT stuff without initdb.
>
> Regression tested.

Applied.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Juan Jose Estigarribia 1998-12-11 16:57:14 documentation Postgres
Previous Message Jan Wieck 1998-10-22 08:53:10 Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message D'Arcy J.M. Cain 1998-10-22 13:57:16 Re: [HACKERS] New INET and CIDR types
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-22 13:51:19 Re: [HACKERS] psql's help