| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com |
| Cc: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v6.4 BETA2 ... |
| Date: | 1998-10-14 17:01:32 |
| Message-ID: | 199810141701.NAA27147@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> Harrr - using text_ops on an int4 field in CREATE INDEX
> doesn't make much sense.
>
> Bruce, please add 6.5 TODO:
>
> Parser must check on CREATE INDEX that the opcdeftype of the
> used operator class is compatible with the indexed field or
> the index functions return type.
But, we don't require ops* anymore. Should we prevent people from using
whatever ops they want?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Terry Mackintosh | 1998-10-14 17:07:16 | Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ? |
| Previous Message | Brook Milligan | 1998-10-14 16:55:38 | perl interface bug? |