Re: [HACKERS] Alternative to LIMIT in SELECT ?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu (Thomas G(dot) Lockhart)
Cc: t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Alternative to LIMIT in SELECT ?
Date: 1998-10-14 16:24:41
Message-ID: 199810141624.MAA26741@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > >> + if (value == NULL) {
> > >> + reset_query_limit();
> > >> + return(TRUE);
> > >> + }
> > >Any idea how 'value' could be null? I could not see how that would
> > >happen.
> > Not sure. I just followed the way other set commands are doing.
>
> This is how RESET is implemented.

Oh.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-14 16:33:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-14 16:18:26 Re: [HACKERS] Alternative to LIMIT in SELECT ?