Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain)
Cc: paul(at)vix(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind
Date: 1998-10-14 03:21:44
Message-ID: 199810140321.XAA15152@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> This sounds bang-on to me. How soon before your functions are in the
> tree? I'll start modifying my code based on this but I won't send it
> in until I have tested it against your functions.

I have not seen any patch yet. Paul, was your earlier posting supposed
to be applied? If so, let me know.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 1998-10-14 04:11:20 Re: [HACKERS] Alternative to LIMIT in SELECT ?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 1998-10-14 03:18:32 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v6.4 BETA2 ...