Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v6.4 BETA2 ...

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bill(dot)Allie(at)mug(dot)org
Cc: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v6.4 BETA2 ...
Date: 1998-10-14 02:43:43
Message-ID: 199810140243.WAA14796@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I will be posting a configure.in tonight with further clean ups to the TCL/TK
> configuration. TCL/TK compile information will now be obtained from the
> tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh, without having to have a list of different
> versions of TCL and TK to search for.
>
> Two item I would like to bring up for discussion is:
>
> 1. Currently TCL/TK support is disabled if TCL is present, but TK is not. This
> is not a good thing because the PL/tcl language is only dependant on TCL,
> not TK. Also pgtclsh only requires TCL. I propose changing configure so
> that TCL and TK support are seperate and the TCL dependant parts of the
> postgreSQL distribution will still build even if TK is not present.
>
> 2. There is currently duplicate Makefile.tcldefs. I propose create a
> Makefile.tcldefs and Makefile.tkdefs at the same directory level as
> Makefile.global and have any Makefile that needs them include them from
> that location. This would then become the 'standard' for compiling TCL
> and TK based packages in the postgreSQL distribution.
>
> Any comments and/or concerns?

Be aware I removed the TCL_LIB, ... stuff from configure.in this
morning. That was the old stuff, and your new stuff made it
unnecessary.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Taral 1998-10-14 02:56:39 RE: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v6.4 BETA2 ...
Previous Message D'Arcy J.M. Cain 1998-10-14 02:36:21 Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind