Re: [HACKERS] Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers]

> > I would be glad to help with integrating it. We need a decision,
> > people. Who do we want to do this, and how are we going to handle
> > integrating this into the beta, if we want to?
> >
> > BTW, does pg_upgrade work for people. That may be a quick fix for the
> > beta people to get these new system types WITHOUT dump/reload.
>
> Better yet, they _should_ use pg_upgrade, so it gets some beta testing
> too :)
>
> I can help with making the types built-in, once there is code ready.
> However, until we finish tracking down the indexing problems I'd like to
> stay away from unrelated changes to the catalogs and backend code to
> avoid confusing the issue.
>
> Now that I think about it, that would have probably included the
> snprintf changes, since now people trying to do debugging may not be
> able to build with a new tree until that gets integrated...

Yes, we are definately on hold until the indexing this is fixed.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)