Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests.u

In message <199809021542(dot)LAA02771(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > Not sure how to find the problem. Without being able to debug it here,
> > > I am left staring at the code over and over again.
> >
> > That sounds like *so* much fun ;-)
> >
> > OK, I've been ignoring the problem until now, and of course may not be
> > of any help even if I were trying to help. I'm also not quite up on the
> > history and sequence of events which led to our current state, and I'm
> > not sure we have a strong regression history yet to pin this down.
> >
> > At the moment we have Bruce and the two sparc guys working on it, and
> > Bruce can't reproduce the problems on his machine and Keith's machine is
> > so dog-slow that he can't do much testing which involve full rebuilds.
> > Boy, it hasn't been long since that model Sparc was the best thing
> > going, eh?
>
> I was on Thomas A. Szybist machine for two hours, and even though I was
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It's really just Tom :)

> telnet'ed across three Internet machines to get there, it made my PP200
> look like it was sitting still. Amazing speed. It is a Sparc running
> Solaris.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
> maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
> + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
> + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

I just grabbed grabbed gcc 2.8.1 from smc.vnet.com. I should have that
installed later today. Full rebuilds are not a problem for me. I did
just get a project bubbled to the top of my queue here that should take
about a day or two. I certainly can try patches and such, but I may
not have time plod through with gdb for a few days. (Not that I can
help much anyway.) I'm also going to be away for Labor day starting
Friday night EST. I'm returning on Tuesday night EST.

Tom Szybist
szybist(at)boxhill(dot)com