From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com |
Cc: | emkxp01(at)mtcc(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Broken PostgreSQL (latest CVS) |
Date: | 1998-08-20 15:33:11 |
Message-ID: | 199808201533.LAA26697@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Looks like the tuple desctiptor given to index_formtuple() is
> corrupted somewhere before the call to memmove() in
> DataFill() line 208.
>
> I think it must have happened inside of DataFill() or
> something DataFill() called, because at the time of failure,
> the on-stack variable tupleDescriptor of index_formtuple()
> looks still good - so I assume index_formtuple() handed the
> correct value to DataFill() at line 78 and it has been
> corrupted after.
>
> BTW: I love gdb.
This is happening during initdb? Hope the new code fixes that.
BTW, it does pass the regression tests on my machine, so I figured
it was safe.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-08-20 15:47:29 | Re: new MB patch and pg_type oid problem |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-08-20 15:23:24 | Re: [HACKERS] Broken PostgreSQL (latest CVS) |