From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu (Thomas G(dot) Lockhart) |
Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] sequence creation |
Date: | 1998-08-19 02:35:12 |
Message-ID: | 199808190235.WAA03846@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Right now, we allow PRIMARY to auto-create an index.
> > Can we have something to auto-create sequences, instead of the more
> > complicated CREATE SEQUENCE process.
> > Perhaps use the data type SERIAL to autocreate a sequence. Should
> > make life easier for novices. We are getting too many sequence
> > questions.
>
> That would be possible. I'd be happier doing it for v6.5, since I'm
> hoping to work on docs in the meantime. Of course, maybe it would be
> easy :)
>
> What should the syntax be exactly?
>
> CREATE TABLE t (s SERIAL);
>
> or
>
> CREATE TABLE t (i INT DEFAULT SERIAL);
>
> or ??
>
> Are there alternate syntaxes from other DBs which should be considered?
Can't be that hard. I like the first one myself, and it matches
Informix.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-08-19 02:35:41 | Re: [HACKERS] sequence creation |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-08-19 01:54:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Massive patch |