| From: | "Dr(dot) Michael Meskes" <meskes(at)online-club(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] ecpg problem |
| Date: | 1998-08-16 11:59:37 |
| Message-ID: | 19980816135937.D540@online-club.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Aug 15, 1998 at 12:27:55PM +0200, Maarten Boekhold wrote:
> > It seems I cannot get that kind of information from libpq other than
> > checking for the result being 0 tuples. But is this correct? Or are there
> > possibilities to get 0 tuples? That is I get PQcmdTuples(results) = 0 with
> > the return code being PGRES_COMMAND_OK.
>
> Shouldn't you check for PGRES_TUPLES_OK ? I always check for this if I
No, the insert command doesn't return any tuples anyway. But then I don't
check for it either. libecpg has to work with every return value and so
checks them all. It just happens that the insert commend returns
PGRES_COMMAND_OK. :-)
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes meskes(at)online-club(dot)de, meskes(at)debian(dot)org
Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Keith Parks | 1998-08-16 12:22:53 | Re: [HACKERS] int8 type -- call for porting results! |
| Previous Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-08-16 05:53:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Regression test status (was type coersion) |