Re: [HACKERS] SPI procedure for removing large objects

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: daveh(at)insightdist(dot)com (David Hartwig)
Cc: peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk, serg(at)gate(dot)informika(dot)ru, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SPI procedure for removing large objects
Date: 1998-08-05 19:31:37
Message-ID: 199808051931.PAA08666@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Peter,
>
> I have just finished up some other stuff in the backend, and I was
> wondering what to do next. My personal list include a cleanup of the lo
> type. Specifically:
>
> 1. Assign a fixed OID to the LO type so that attributes of this type
> can easily be identified.
>
> 2. Write a VACUUM LO procedure.
>
> 3. Extend/verify the existing internal lo functions to work with the
> new type.
>
> I know that more can/should be done in this area, but I only have so much
> time. I am aware the you have done some work on this in the contrib area.
> Were you planning on handling any (or all) of these issues as part of the
> 6.4 base release? I will gladly move on to something else.
>

We should also make a large object type, rather than using inv_ to
identify it. It is on the TODO list, and I can implement it whenever
you want.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jackson, DeJuan 1998-08-05 19:56:58 RE: [HACKERS] Don't forget about Groups
Previous Message Dr. Michael Meskes 1998-08-05 19:18:40 Declare Cursor question again