From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | vadim(at)krs(dot)ru (Vadim Mikheev) |
Cc: | scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, dg(at)illustra(dot)com, miker(at)hub(dot)org, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4 |
Date: | 1998-06-30 04:36:25 |
Message-ID: | 199806300436.AAA07550@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > As for dropping/recreating all indices...that isn't really so bad,
> > > anyway...once all the data is there, th edatabase can go live...albeit
> > > *very* slow, in some cases, if I have 4 indices on a table, each one built
> > > should improve the speed of queries, but each build shouldn't limit the
> > > ability for the database to be up...
> >
> > Doesn't index creation lock the table?
>
> Lock for read...
Yep, good point. Reads are OK.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-06-30 04:40:30 | flowchart updated |
Previous Message | Vadim Mikheev | 1998-06-30 04:20:02 | Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4 |