Re: [HACKERS] non-functional update notice unneccesarily

>
>
> There are times when the message is appropriate, I believe. But this
> is not one of them. Are all instances of this message gone, or just
> this one?
>
> On Mon, 15 June 1998, at 22:51:13, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > update mempayment set paywho = 'icvproxy' from do_addpayment where dappays
> > > eq = payseqid;
> > > NOTICE: Non-functional update, only first update is performed
> > > UPDATE 31
> > >
> > > more than one update was indeed performed..
> > > I beleive this has happened to me before..
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Vadim has said to remove the message, and I have done so. The
> > surrounding code in heapam.c is unchanged, just the elog(NOTICE) is
> > commented out.

All instances are gone.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)