| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | mikhail(dot)routchiev(at)csfb(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] One problem with Postgres...\ |
| Date: | 1998-05-13 15:48:56 |
| Message-ID: | 199805131548.LAA15858@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there any plan to deal with the problem of Postgres server going
> through inefficiencies of the filesystem (because the separate tables are
> placed into separate files)?
>
> If on Solaris, or Sun, there is a big enough table (say 300MB), it
> takes 600MB of the disk space, and grows proportionally (2 times!). So we could
> observe: 1) loss of disk space, and 2) loss of performance as well, because of
> going through file system block search (for big files) may not be very
> efficient, compare to Sybase&Co. (they use partitions, and deal with their own
> 'file system'...)
>
> Well, one recommendation could be to go with the efficient
> filesystem... But I believe it may not be appropriate for most of users.
>
> If anybody knows how to overcome this problem, please let me know.
>
We have discussed this, and it is not as big a win as you may think. An
Informix guy feels this is true, so it is not an idle thought.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-05-13 15:51:12 | Re: [HACKERS] money or dollar type |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-05-13 15:47:00 | Re: [HACKERS] mmap and MAP_ANON |