Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh]

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: dg(at)illustra(dot)com (David Gould)
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh]
Date: 1998-05-12 03:19:57
Message-ID: 199805120319.XAA11507@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I was thinking that we would have a pool of ready servers _per_database_.
> That is, we would be able to configure say 8 servers in a particular DB, and
> say 4 in another DB etc. These servers could run most of the way through
> initialization (open catalogs, read in syscache etc). Then they would wait
> until a connection for the desired DB was handed to them by the postmaster.
>

OK, but how do you invalidate the catalog items that have changed from
the startup to the time it gets the client connection?

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-05-12 05:17:43 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] money or dollar type
Previous Message David Gould 1998-05-11 22:09:49 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh]